NJ judge suspended for harsh behavior in truancy cases

A judge in New Jersey got in large trouble for how he dealt with youngsters and households in the courtroom. Brett J. Simon became a part-time judge in Somerset County. He labored in courts for Bridgewater, Somerville, Raritan, and Sure Brook. but he was given a suspension in February, 12 months after people complained about his behavior.
The New Jersey Supreme Court docket stated Simon did many wrong things at some point during the truancy instances. Those are courtroom cases about children who leave out an excessive amount of college. In place of speaking to parents, Simon would yell at the children. He also saved asking families in the event that they have been within the US legally, despite the fact that this had nothing to do with faculty attendance.
Courtroom papers say Simon stated very simple matters to children. In one case from August 2024, he called a pupil a “piece of garbage” and “vile.” When the boy said his mother wasn’t a criminal, Simon threatened to call ICE to deport her. He informed the boy, “You want your mother to get deported?” in a sarcastic manner.
In any other case, that same day, Simon scared a woman who turned up late to school. He informed her she might be dispatched to a risky institution in Newark, wherein she might “be overwhelmed.” He also threatened to name infant protection services. Whilst he determined that her mom turned into an immigrant, he again added up deportation.
In a third case in January, Simon informed a 14-year-old who missed many faculty days that ICE officers “wait out of doors the door for people such as you.” He announced that the kid’s mom may be deported due to the faculty problems.
New Jersey regulation says parents may be fined $25 to $one hundred consistent with the day if their kids ages 6 to 16 omit school. However, judges should not use immigration reputation in those instances.
Simon’s lawyer stated the decision is in reality “tough-operating and compassionate.” They plan to show extra statistics on approximately what happened.
This example indicates how crucial it is for judges to deal with people fairly in the court docket. The state continues to be determining what punishment Simon may face. Many human beings are disenchanted that a choice could bully kids and threaten immigrant households this way.
The case reminds us that everybody in court deserves admiration, especially children who might not understand the felony device. Judges have strength but ought to use it the proper way.