“Leavitt’s Latest Attack: Democrats’ Base Labeled ‘Terrorists and Criminals’ in Viral Remarks”
In a furious interview last week, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called Democrats “Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals.” She responded to questions about a New York City mayoral candidate who refused to say if Hamas should disarm and leave Gaza. Democrats’ absence showed cooperation with extremists, argued Leavitt.
Leavitt’s message was clear: Democrats favor extremists and noncitizens, while Republicans promote lawful, peaceful citizens. Trump defends law-abiding citizens, not dangerous or disruptive ones, she remarked. Her language was seen as pre-election partisan escalation.
Political leaders and onlookers reacted quickly. Dehumanizing political disagreement by labeling millions of Americans terrorists or criminals, Leavitt was accused of instigating strife. Some noted that Republicans had decried rhetorical radicalism when targeted but now protected Democrats. Others deemed the remarks unpleasant and tone-deaf, suggesting they deepen national division.
Democratic lawmakers criticized Leavitt’s remarks as anti-democracy. Despite stating most on both sides are decent, Minnesota’s governor accused the White House of promoting hostility. A U.S. lawmaker called the claims “grossly dark” and asked how people would react to terrorist labeling. Former presidential aides, media analysts, and civil society groups warned that harsh language endangers political debate.
Remember that the current administration has long utilized excessive partisan terminology. A pivotal White House spokesperson criticizes a party’s base. Some hope it will rouse the GOP base, while others worry it would alienate moderates or cause blowback.
Leavitt’s opinions may dominate American politics during the 2025 election and Israel-Gaza war. Party fortunes and national debate are threatened. Will such rhetoric exacerbate differences or promote civil discourse? Time will tell.
Sources
The Daily Beast
